When a borrower’s property, which serves as loan collateral, experiences damage, the consequences affect not only the borrower but also the lender. The lender also has a financial interest in the property. Because the property secures the mortgage loan, any loss or damage to it creates a potential risk for the lender. Insurance coverage, therefore, becomes a key element in how both parties manage the situation. Mortgage Requirements for Property Insurance In most conventional mortgage agreements, borrowers must keep insurance on the property to guard against risks like fire, storms, vandalism, and other typical threats. This is often called hazard insurance. While standard in many cases, these requirements can differ based on the loan type, lender guidelines, or even state regulations. The agreement usually stipulates that the lender be listed as a loss payee or mortgagee on the policy, giving them a legal claim for any payout for damage. The Claims Process: Borrower and Lender Involvement If damage occurs, the borrower usually contacts the insurance provider to begin the claims process. However, the borrower is also required to notify the lender or mortgage servicer, particularly if the damage affects the habitability or structural integrity of the property. Borrowers ought to notify promptly to stay in line with policy terms. From that point forward, the insurance process involves the participation of both the borrower and the lender. How Insurance Payments Are Issued and Managed Once the insurance company evaluates the damage and approves the claim, it will issue a payment. In most cases, the payment will be made payable to both the borrower and the lender. This dual-payee structure reflects the lender’s interest in the property and ensures that insurance proceeds are not used for purposes unrelated to the repair or reconstruction of the property. Minor Damage vs. Major Damage Procedures How the lender handles those funds depends on things like the claim size, the loan's status, and how bad the damage is. For minor issues often below a lender-specific threshold, say a certain dollar amount or percentage of the coverage and if the borrower's up to date on payments, the lender might just sign off on the check and hand it over. In other scenarios, they could park the money in an escrow account and release it in chunks as work progresses, a setup known as a draw process to confirm the repairs restore the property properly. For bigger problems, lenders generally want to see contractor bids, plans, and proof of finished work before doling out cash. They might even dispatch inspectors to check progress. The borrower has to stay in close touch with the lender during all this. Managing Severe Damage or Total Loss If the borrowers behind on the mortgage or the property's wrecked to the point it's unlivable, the lender might use the insurance money to pay down the loan balance instead of funding fixes—provided the borrower isn't moving forward with repairs or rebuilding isn't feasible. This option is often baked into the mortgage terms, especially when the security is at serious risk. In a total loss situation, if the borrower opts not to rebuild, the lender could apply the full payout to the debt. Any leftover after settling the loan goes back to the borrower. If it's not enough to cover everything, the borrower might still owe the difference, unless the agreement or state laws say otherwise. Servicing Guidelines and Regulatory Requirements Lenders have servicing guidelines that govern how they must manage insurance claims. These guidelines are set by investors such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal Housing Administration, or private institutions, depending on the type of loan. These guidelines outline the circumstances under which funds must be escrowed, the timelines for inspections, and the documentation requirements for releasing funds. Mortgage servicers are obligated to follow these rules and ensure that insurance funds are used to preserve the property that secures the loan. Borrower Obligations Under the Mortgage Agreement The borrower’s obligation is to use the insurance proceeds for the purpose intended under the loan agreement, which is usually the repair or restoration of the property. If the borrower fails to do so, the lender may consider the loan in default, even if the borrower is current on payments. Mortgage agreements often provide the lender with remedies in such cases, including the right to complete repairs directly or pursue foreclosure if the property has lost substantial value and the loan is at risk of default. Common Disputes Between Borrowers and Lenders In some cases, borrowers and lenders disagree over how insurance funds should be used. These disputes may involve delays in releasing funds, disagreements about repair estimates, or questions about whether the borrower intends to rebuild. Lenders may also face operational challenges, particularly in situations where a regional disaster, such as a hurricane or wildfire, has affected a large number of properties. In such cases, lenders may receive multiple claims simultaneously and must manage their internal processes accordingly. Borrowers have rights under federal law (e.g., RESPA) to request timely releases and dispute unfair practices. Special Considerations for Flood Damage Borrowers living in areas designated as flood zones may be required to carry separate flood insurance. Standard hazard insurance policies do not typically cover flood damage. Claims under the National Flood Insurance Program follow a different process, and lenders may apply different procedures when managing these claims. Lenders may also require additional documentation before releasing flood insurance proceeds, depending on the terms of the loan and the extent of the damage. NFIP guidelines may require additional compliance, such as local floodplain ordinances. Disaster-Related Relief Programs and Temporary Rules When a federally declared disaster occurs, federal or state programs may provide additional relief or temporary guidelines for handling insurance claims and mortgage servicing. These programs may extend foreclosure timelines, delay the application of insurance funds to loan balances, or provide borrowers with additional time to submit documentation. Servicers must follow these temporary policies when they apply and notify borrowers of their rights under the relevant guidelines. Balancing Rights and Responsibilities In all cases, the lender's primary concern is the preservation of the property’s value. Because the property serves as security for the loan, lenders have both the right and the responsibility to ensure that insurance proceeds are used in a way that protects that value. Borrowers, on the other hand, must comply with the terms of their mortgage and provide the necessary documentation to demonstrate that the repairs are underway or have been completed. This process is structured to balance the rights of both parties. The lender must release funds in a timely and reasonable manner and must not delay disbursements without cause. The borrower must provide estimates, proof of loss, and evidence of repairs, and must use the funds in accordance with the purpose outlined in the loan documents. Conclusion: Insurance as a Safeguard for Property Value In summary, insurance coverage plays a critical role when a property that secures a loan is damaged. Both the borrower and the lender have legal and financial interests in the insurance proceeds. Mortgage agreements and servicing guidelines define the rights and responsibilities of each party. As Jason D Koontz, Real Estate Appraiser and Expert Witness, emphasizes, Understanding this framework helps ensure that the insurance process supports the restoration of the property while maintaining compliance with the mortgage terms. Disclaimer: This post offers general insights based on common U.S. mortgage practices and isn't intended as legal or financial advice. Rules can vary by loan type, lender policies, state laws, or specific circumstances—always consult a professional for your situation. *This blog post was developed with significant assistance from Julie K. Miller, Research Assistant at JD Koontz, LLC. New developments in mortgage lending are underway with the rollout of VantageScore 4.0, a modern credit scoring model featured in a recent national press release where I was quoted. I had the opportunity to contribute insights into this national release and was quoted in the article, offering perspective on what this change means for the lending industry. “The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced on July 11, 2025, that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will now accept a new credit score model, VantageScore 4.0, for mortgage underwriting.” This shift could transform how borrowers are evaluated for home loans, especially those with limited or non-traditional credit histories. The model’s adoption follows a federal announcement and reflects evolving efforts to modernize the mortgage lending process. This policy change takes effect immediately, enabling lenders to adopt the VantageScore 4.0 model without requiring extensive modifications to their existing systems. Its compatibility with tri-merge credit reports from Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion enables a smooth integration process. In this post, I will break down what this change means for mortgage lending and why it matters. What Is VantageScore 4.0? VantageScore 4.0 is a modern credit scoring model created by the VantageScore consortium, a joint venture among the three major credit bureaus. It uses machine learning and trended credit data to evaluate borrower risk. Unlike older models, it considers how a consumer’s credit behavior evolves, rather than just a snapshot of recent credit activity. One significant advancement is its inclusion of alternative data points that older models typically ignore. As the article explains, “VantageScore 4.0 includes rent, utility, and phone payments data that could help up to 33 million more Americans qualify for a mortgage.” This expanded data set provides a more comprehensive view of a borrower’s creditworthiness, particularly benefiting those with limited access to traditional credit products. Why This Change Matters This update stems from the End of GSE Conservatorship Preparation Act of 2025, a bipartisan law aimed at increasing competition in credit scoring. While VantageScore 4.0 was initially approved in 2022, its implementation had been delayed. Now, under the updated policy, lenders have more flexibility to use modern scoring models. Plans to allow additional models, such as FICO 10T, remain under review. This move reflects efforts by regulators and lawmakers to modernize mortgage lending and expand access to credit for underserved consumers, including younger borrowers, recent immigrants, and those building credit through alternative means. What Makes This Model Different? Unlike static models that rely only on current balances and payment history, VantageScore 4.0 uses trended data. This allows it to see long-term patterns in credit use, such as decreasing balances or consistent on-time payments, which are strong indicators of responsible financial behavior. Because it pulls data from all three credit bureaus, lenders can use it with their existing tri-merge reports, reducing barriers to adoption and making the transition smoother for mortgage providers. The model’s design makes it especially helpful for borrowers with little traditional credit history. It provides a clearer picture of how someone uses and manages credit, even when they do not have a long history of credit card or loan usage, which has historically limited their access to home loans. A Practical Example for Borrowers The article includes a hypothetical case to show how this model can impact real people. “With VantageScore 4.0, your on-time rent payments can now count toward your credit history. This could help you qualify for a $200,000 home loan with a $1,250 monthly principal and interest payment.” This represents a fundamental shift in who may qualify for a mortgage. Young professionals, renters, immigrants, and gig economy workers who lack traditional credit profiles may benefit the most. For many, this creates a new pathway to homeownership that was previously unavailable. Lender Adoption and Market Outlook Although the model is available immediately, not all lenders will adopt it at the same pace. Jason "JD" Koontz banking expert and other industry professionals note, “Some institutions may move quickly to incorporate the new model, while others may take a more cautious approach, waiting for additional guidance and data from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” What Borrowers Should Do Next For consumers who have struggled to build credit or were previously denied mortgage financing due to limited credit history, this could be a turning point. VantageScore 4.0 may open new opportunities to qualify for financing and secure more favorable loan terms. At the same time, borrowers should remain proactive. Even with this new model, credit behavior still matters. Paying rent, utilities, and phone bills on time could now play a more visible role in credit assessments. Checking your credit reports regularly for errors and monitoring how lenders use scoring models are important steps to take in today’s changing lending environment. Broader Industry Impact By recognizing payment patterns and expanding the types of data used in credit scoring, VantageScore 4.0 aligns with ongoing efforts to make homeownership more accessible. Its approval and immediate availability give lenders a tool that is both forward-looking and inclusive. For the mortgage industry, this represents a shift toward more flexible, data-driven lending decisions. It may also enable lenders to meet the needs of diverse borrower populations better while continuing to manage risk responsibly. Increased competition in credit scoring models may also drive innovation and better consumer outcomes. Final Thoughts The adoption of VantageScore 4.0 for mortgage underwriting marks an essential milestone in the evolution of credit scoring. With its use of machine learning and trended data, this model promises to more accurately assess borrower risk and expand access to homeownership for millions of Americans. However, adoption will vary. Borrowers should take the time to ask lenders about the scoring models they use and how the new rules may affect their mortgage eligibility. As with any financial change, knowledge and preparation are key. You can read the full article at KRON4’s website: New Credit Score Option for Home Loans Starts Today. *This blog post was developed with significant assistance from Julie K. Miller, Research Assistant at JD Koontz, LLC. |
Jason D KoontzJason Koontz is a former bank Senior VP. He now serves as an expert witness in banking & real estate matters across the United States.. Archives
January 2026
Categories |